Automated reviews by AI, based on
review criteria your organization has accumulated
DC Agentiqs can automatically check deliverables for omissions and rule violations.
Based on review criteria and standards, it helps ensure quality and prevent mistakes.
This lets you leave what self-review can catch to AI, freeing up time for people to carefully review the parts that matter most.
scenario1
Analyze past review findings
and build a review checklist
Analyze accumulated past review results to generate effective criteria for self-review and automated review.
実行の流れ
- Collect past review data
- The agent statistically analyzes trends in the findings
- Extract the highest-priority criteria
- Automatically generate and update the checklist
scenario2
Automatically review design documents
for omissions, based on the checklist
Based on the checklist, automatically detect and flag omissions and inconsistencies in design documents.
実行の流れ
- Analyze the structure of the design document
- Check it against the review checklist
- Identify where things are missing
- Automatically generate review findings and improvement suggestions
- Run the review comprehensively through the workflow
scenario3
Comprehensively review source code
against coding standards
Automatically check source code against the established coding standards.
実行の流れ
- Retrieve the source code files
- Check them against the coding standards
- Detect violations of the standards
- Suggest fixes and assess priority
- Run the verification comprehensively through the workflow
-
scenario1
Analyze past review findings
and build a review checklistAnalyze accumulated past review results to generate effective criteria for self-review and automated review.
実行の流れ
- Collect past review data
- The agent statistically analyzes trends in the findings
- Extract the highest-priority criteria
- Automatically generate and update the checklist
-
scenario2
Automatically review design documents
for omissions, based on the checklistBased on the checklist, automatically detect and flag omissions and inconsistencies in design documents.
実行の流れ
- Analyze the structure of the design document
- Check it against the review checklist
- Identify where things are missing
- Automatically generate review findings and improvement suggestions
- Run the review comprehensively through the workflow
-
scenario3
Comprehensively review source code
against coding standardsAutomatically check source code against the established coding standards.
実行の流れ
- Retrieve the source code files
- Check them against the coding standards
- Detect violations of the standards
- Suggest fixes and assess priority
- Run the verification comprehensively through the workflow
Benefits of this use case
-
Improved review efficiency
- Automate routine checks so people can focus on higher-level review
-
Thorough mistake prevention
- Comprehensive checks that make up for human oversight
-
More consistent quality
- Consistent quality assurance that draws on past know-how
-
Reduced reviewer workload
- Experienced reviewers can focus on higher-value work
